ARTICLE à LIRE sur le SITE WEB du magazine français PSYCHOLOGIES,
LIEN :
https://www.psychologies.com/moi/se-connaitre/Les-personnes-qui-parlent-seules-sont-plus-intelligentes-que-la-moyenne-cest-la-science-qui-le-dit-623991
 | ||||||||||
| ||||||||||
| ||||||||||
| ||||||||||
| Afficher la page de la pétition | ||||||||||
| ||||||||||
|
© 2026, Change.org, PBC
 |
Un rorqual commun blessé par un harpon (enfoncé dans son flanc) est hissé sur la terre ferme à Hvalfjordur, en Islande. Les rorquals communs sont considérés comme vulnérables sur la Liste rouge des espèces menacées de l'UICN. © IFAW. |
Bonjour, |
L’interdiction internationale de la chasse commerciale à la baleine est entrée en vigueur en 1986, après des siècles de massacre ininterrompu. Cette décision, rendue possible grâce au soutien de sympathisants tels que vous, représente l’une des plus importantes victoires de l’histoire moderne dans le domaine de la protection des animaux.
Quarante ans plus tard, les menaces refont surface. Plus que jamais, l’avenir des baleines est entre nos mains.
Malgré les progrès accomplis ces dernières décennies, la chasse commerciale à la baleine reste autorisée dans des pays comme l’Islande, la Norvège et le Japon, alors même que les baleines font face à un nombre croissant de menaces à cause des activités humaines, à travers le monde. |
Depuis des années, votre engagement, comme celui de milliers d’autres sympathisants d’IFAW, contribue à défendre les baleines et les océans, sur de multiples fronts :
|
 |
Le Dr Oliver Boisseau, le scientifique en chef du Song of the Whale, et la pilote de drones Eleanor Heywood se préparent à tester un drone destiné au suivi non invasif de baleines. © IFAW |
Nous ne pouvons pas relâcher nos efforts maintenant. Restez informé-e des enjeux auxquels sont confrontées les baleines afin de comprendre comment votre engagement peut contribuer à protéger ces animaux et les océans où ils vivent, pour les générations à venir.
Merci de tout ce que vous faites pour améliorer le sort des animaux à travers le monde. |
L’équipe IFAW.
|
Suivez-nous |
|
Fonds international pour la protection des animaux 14 rue Edouard Mignot, CS 30022, 51722 Reims Cedex, France |
 |
Donald Trump is trying to turn America’s banking system into another weapon for his mass deportation agenda. His administration is directing federal regulators to pressure banks into scrutinizing customers’ immigration status, placing greater suspicion on people who use Individual Taxpayer Identification Numbers, and expanding financial surveillance of immigrant communities. ITINs are lawful identification numbers issued by the federal government so people without Social Security numbers can pay taxes and comply with federal law. Trump’s Treasury Department now wants banks to consider ITIN use as a potential risk factor when customers open accounts or apply for credit. The administration also wants lenders to consider the possibility that an immigrant borrower could lose work authorization, wages, or the ability to remain in the country. That opens the door to denying mortgages, credit cards, and other financial services based on immigration status instead of a person’s actual ability to repay. JPMorgan Chase, Bank of America, Citigroup, Wells Fargo, and U.S. Bank have enormous power over whether this attack succeeds. Their CEOs must reject discrimination against immigrant customers and refuse to turn their employees into immigration enforcement agents.
Access to a bank account allows people to deposit paychecks, pay bills, save for emergencies, establish credit, and build a stable economic life. Driving immigrant families out of banks will push more money into check cashers and shadow banking companies that charge higher prices and operate with weaker protections. Trump’s proposal is so dangerous that opposition reaches across the political spectrum. The libertarian Cato Institute has warned against turning banks into “citizenship police,” arguing that immigration enforcement through financial institutions would expand government surveillance, undermine privacy, and create costly new burdens for banks and people. Frontline bank employees should never be ordered to guess whether a person belongs in this country. They should never be pressured to treat a lawful taxpayer identification number as evidence of wrongdoing. And they should never be forced to choose between serving their customers and advancing Trump’s deportation agenda. The five biggest banks must publicly commit to protecting immigrant customers, refusing immigration-based discrimination, preserving lawful access to accounts and credit, and keeping citizenship verification beyond existing legal requirements out of their branches. Let’s keep Trump’s deportation machine out of our banks. - Ericka. Ericka Taylor (she/her)
|
| Paid for by Americans for Financial Reform |
